Likes:
PHP:
- Completely open source. I don't mandate open source software, but it is nice.
- Very easy to host on a Linux system. I hear it also works in Windows, but alas, I have never even tried.
- Customizable — it does what I tell it to do.
- Extremely well-documented. I like the MSDN library, though at times, it can be too much information.
- Easy separation of code and layout. I like being able to move "controls" around and having absolutely nothing change as far as the code is concerned.
- It uses "controls", widgets that mimic Windows GUI elements (from the programmer's standpoint). At first, I thought it was a bad idea, until I realized I didn't ever have to bother with writing HTML for things.
- It's very easy to use AJAX without actually coding JavaScript. I have nothing against JavaScript; it's just another technology I'm going to have to learn sooner or later.
- It's open source (at least I think it is, now).
- It is also well-documented. It's amazing how much commercial support helps documentation.
PHP:
- Documentation of some modules is poor, misleading, or confusing.
- Code and layout are strictly coupled. This leads to a really large mess of indentation and spaghetti code, since some blocks of HTML may be inside conditional/loop constructions, etc.
- It's incredibly proprietary. Sure, there is Mono, but it only supports most of ASP.NET. One of its major exclusions (as of now) is AJAX.
- There is too much documentation. I'm sometimes confused with finding certain documents.
- It's simply too confusing. It's broken up into way too many pieces. It peeves me when I don't use something as it is intended; with Java, I can't figure out what piece is supposed to do what.
No comments:
Post a Comment